Ktown스토리
케이톡
An false accusation out of the blue.
Some people are hopelessly inadequate in writing his/her opinion, regardless their basic grammar in place. In composition of either an essay or an article there are a few basic requirements to be met in order for his/her to convey messages properly so that the reader could understand the main point in its expression.
The general rules are 3 C's, Clear, Compact and Courteous. To have the statement clear, firstly the writer is required to take steps in a sequence of introduction, expansion, elaboration and conclusion, including the right vocabulary in its use, of course.
Secondly Compact means that the whole expounding should not be repeated again and again what was already mentioned earlier. In another word, the shorter the better, in contrary to the spoken form, with the exception of Abe Lincoln's Gettysburg Address which is short and compacted as an example.
Finally it should be directed toward the conclusion without missing what was originally intended to accomplish, as well as the proper respect to readers.
If someone did not observe those golden rules in writing, it could possibly end up as a garbage with lots of gibberish, which refer to speech or other use of language that is nonsense, or that appears to be nonsense."
You can see the exact case in today's article named "어느 재미 교포 어르신의 글", which maintains the president of Korea, quote-문재인 정권은 무조건 북한에 퍼주자는 굴종 파들, 김정은 상왕(上王)시대도 좋으니 북한식으로 살자는 종북 파들, 스스로 중국의 속국이 되겠다는 從中事大(종중사대) 파들의 칼춤바람에 나라의 기둥이 무너져 내리고 있습니다. so and so,-unquote.
You may find this article nothing proper in such a way for the writer to assert as per the rule explained above his point of view in the matters of falsely accusing his government to be communist followers, and the like. The reason is why those were not based on the fact, but his twisted fallacy imagined.
It does not approach the right way from the start to prove systematically his intrigue against him as well as his cabinet members logically either. And therefore "어느 재미 교포 어르신의 글" is not worthy of paying attention only to an vicious accusation out of the blue.
禪涅槃
The general rules are 3 C's, Clear, Compact and Courteous. To have the statement clear, firstly the writer is required to take steps in a sequence of introduction, expansion, elaboration and conclusion, including the right vocabulary in its use, of course.
Secondly Compact means that the whole expounding should not be repeated again and again what was already mentioned earlier. In another word, the shorter the better, in contrary to the spoken form, with the exception of Abe Lincoln's Gettysburg Address which is short and compacted as an example.
Finally it should be directed toward the conclusion without missing what was originally intended to accomplish, as well as the proper respect to readers.
If someone did not observe those golden rules in writing, it could possibly end up as a garbage with lots of gibberish, which refer to speech or other use of language that is nonsense, or that appears to be nonsense."
You can see the exact case in today's article named "어느 재미 교포 어르신의 글", which maintains the president of Korea, quote-문재인 정권은 무조건 북한에 퍼주자는 굴종 파들, 김정은 상왕(上王)시대도 좋으니 북한식으로 살자는 종북 파들, 스스로 중국의 속국이 되겠다는 從中事大(종중사대) 파들의 칼춤바람에 나라의 기둥이 무너져 내리고 있습니다. so and so,-unquote.
You may find this article nothing proper in such a way for the writer to assert as per the rule explained above his point of view in the matters of falsely accusing his government to be communist followers, and the like. The reason is why those were not based on the fact, but his twisted fallacy imagined.
It does not approach the right way from the start to prove systematically his intrigue against him as well as his cabinet members logically either. And therefore "어느 재미 교포 어르신의 글" is not worthy of paying attention only to an vicious accusation out of the blue.
禪涅槃
좋아요 0
태그
DISCLAIMER
이곳에 게시된 글들은 에이전트 혹은 사용자가 자유롭게 올린 게시물입니다. 커뮤니티 내용을 확인하고 참여에 따른 법적, 경제적, 기타 문제의 책임은 본인에게 있습니다.
케이타운 1번가는 해당 컨텐츠에 대해 어떠한 의견이나 대표성을 가지지 않으며, 커뮤니티 서비스에 게재된 정보에 의해 입은 손해나 피해에 대하여 어떠한 책임도 지지 않습니다.
